Skip to main content

Can energy be sucked out of a black hole?

Can energy be sucked out of a black hole?
 Can energy be sucked out of a black hole?

 A rotating region is such an extreme force of nature that it drags surrounding time and space around with it. So it's only natural to ask whether black holes might be used as some kind of energy source. In 1969, mathematical physicist Roger Penrose proposed a way to try to to just this, now referred to as the "Penrose Process."



The method might be employed by sophisticated civilizations (aliens or future humans) to reap energy by making "black hole bombs." a number of the physics required to try to to so, however, had never been experimentally verified — so far . Our study confirming the underlying physics has just been published in Nature Physics.

Around its event horizon (the boundary around a region beyond which nothing, not even light, can escape), a rotating region creates a neighborhood called the "ergosphere." If an object falls into the ergosphere in such how that it splits — with one part falling into the region and therefore the other escaping — the part that flees effectively gains energy at the expense of the region . So by sending objects or light toward a rotating region , we could get energy back.

But does this theory hold up? In 1971, the Russian physicist Yakov Zel'dovich translated it to other rotating systems that would be tested back on Earth. The region became a rotating cylinder made up of a cloth which will absorb energy.

Advertisement
Zel'dovich imagined that light waves could extract energy from the cylinder and become amplified. For the amplification effect to figure , however, these waves got to have something called "angular momentum," which twists them into spirals.

When twisted light waves hit such a cylinder, their frequency should change due to something called the "Doppler shift." you've got presumably experienced this when taking note of an ambulance siren. When it moves toward you it's a better pitch than when it moves faraway from you — the direction of travel changes the pitch of the sound. during a similar way, changes in rotational speed alter the perceived frequency of a light-weight wave.

If the cylinder rotates fast enough, the altered wave frequency should drop so low that it'll become negative (which simply means the wave spins within the opposite direction).

Positive frequency waves should be partly absorbed by the cylinder, losing energy. But the negative frequency waves would transform this loss into gain and instead become amplified by the cylinder. they might extract energy from the rotation, a bit like the thing escaping from Penrose's region .



Testing Zeldovich's theory may appear simple. But the rotating object must spin at an equivalent or higher frequency because the waves. To amplify light waves, which oscillate at a frequency of many trillions of times a second, you'd got to rotate an absorbing object billions of times faster than anything that's mechanically possible today.

Breakthrough eventually
Light travels at about 300 million meters per second. So to form the idea easier to check , we opted to use sound waves, which travel roughly 1,000,000 times slower, meaning we didn't need the absorber to rotate so quickly.

Advertisement
To create a twisted acoustic wave , we used a hoop of speakers all emitting an equivalent frequency but starting at slightly different times, therefore the sound follows a spiral. For our rotating absorber we used a bit of sound-absorbing foam attached to a motor. Microphones placed inside the froth allowed us to record the sound after it had interacted with the rotating absorber.

We found that when the froth span slowly (at a coffee frequency), the sound we recorded was quieter because it had been absorbed by the froth . But once we spun the froth fast enough for it to Doppler effect the frequency of the sound waves enough to form them negative, the sound became louder.

This can only mean that the acoustic wave had taken energy from our rotating absorber, finally proving the 50-year-old

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Interstellar dust

Interstellar dust Only about 0.7 percent of the mass of the  interstellar space  is  within the  sort of  solid grains, but these grains have a profound effect on the physical conditions within the gas. Their main effect is  to soak up  stellar radiation; for photons unable to ionize hydrogen and for wavelengths outside absorption lines or bands, the dust grains are  far more  opaque than the gas. The dust absorption increases with photon energy, so long-wavelength radiation (radio and far-infrared) can penetrate dust freely, near-infrared  very well  , and ultraviolet relatively poorly. Dark, cold molecular clouds, within which all star formation takes place, owe their existence to dust. Besides absorbing starlight, the dust acts to heat the gas under some conditions (by ejecting electrons produced by the photoelectric effect, following the absorption of a stellar photon) and  to chill  the gas under other conditions ...

"Proxima Centauri " the nearest star from us

The proxima centauri ..... proximal centaur I  The star Proxima isn’t visible to the attention , but it’s one among the foremost noted stars in Earth’s sky. That’s because it's considered to be a part of the Alpha Centauri star system, a triple system, and therefore the nearest star system to our sun. Of the three stars in Alpha Centauri , Proxima is assumed to be the one actually closest to our sun, at 4.22 light-years away. The image above – from the Hubble Space Telescope – is one among the simplest we’ve seen at showing Proxima clearly. proxima centauri  If it’s so nearby, why can’t we see Proxima with the eye? It’s because Proxima is so small. It’s a red dwarf star star with only about an eighth of the mass of the sun. Faint red Proxima – at only 3,100 degrees K (5,120 F) and 500 times less bright than our sun – is almost a fifth of a light-year from Alpha Centauri A and B. This great distance from the 2 primary stars within the system is what calls int...

How NASA Will Protect Astronauts From Space Radiation at the Moon

How NASA Will Protect Astronauts From Space Radiation at the Moon August 1972, as NASA scientist Ian Richardson remembers it, was hot. In Surrey, England, where he grew up, the fields were brown and dry, and other people tried to remain indoors — out of the Sun, televisions on. except for several days that month, his TV picture kept ending . “Do not adjust your set,” he recalls the BBC announcing. “Heat isn’t causing the interference. It’s sunspots.” The same sunspots that disrupted the tv signals led to enormous solar flares — powerful bursts of energy from the Sun — Aug. 4-7 that year. Between the Apollo 16 and 17 missions, the solar eruptions were a mishap for lunar explorers. Had they been in orbit or on the Moon’s surface, they might have experienced high levels of radiation sparked by the eruptions. Today, the Apollo-era flares function a reminder of the threat of radiation exposure to technology and astronauts in space. Understanding and predicting solar eruptions is cru...