Skip to main content

"Proxima Centauri " the nearest star from us



The proxima centauri .....
proximal centaur I 



The star Proxima isn’t visible to the attention , but it’s one among the foremost noted stars in Earth’s sky. That’s because it's considered to be a part of the Alpha Centauri star system, a triple system, and therefore the nearest star system to our sun. Of the three stars in Alpha Centauri , Proxima is assumed to be the one actually closest to our sun, at 4.22 light-years away. The image above – from the Hubble Space Telescope – is one among the simplest we’ve seen at showing Proxima clearly.
proxima centauri 


If it’s so nearby, why can’t we see Proxima with the eye? It’s because Proxima is so small. It’s a red dwarf star star with only about an eighth of the mass of the sun. Faint red Proxima – at only 3,100 degrees K (5,120 F) and 500 times less bright than our sun – is almost a fifth of a light-year from Alpha Centauri A and B.

This great distance from the 2 primary stars within the system is what calls into question its status as a part of a triple star system.

On the opposite hand, although Proxima is way from Alpha Centauri A and B, it's not very faraway from us. And thus – over time – we will see its motion through space.


Alpha Centauri A and B are a double-star system, and a 3rd star, Proxima – whose location with reference to the opposite two is indicated here by an arrow – might or won't be gravitationally sure to them. Proxima is that the closest star to Earth. Image via the ecu Southern Observatory.

In 2016, the ecu Southern Observatory announced the invention of Proxima b, a planet orbiting Proxima at a distance of roughly 7.5 million km (4.7 million miles) with an orbital period of roughly 11.2 Earth days. Its estimated mass is a minimum of 1.3 times that of the world . The equilibrium temperature of Proxima b is estimated to be within the range of where water could exist as liquid on its surface, thus placing it within the habitable zone of Proxima . But a 2017 study suggests that the exoplanet doesn't have an Earth-like atmosphere. which will indicate that radiation from its star would drain an Earth-like atmosphere 10,000 times faster than on Earth, although because Proxima may be a red dwarf star and a red dwarf , whether it could support life is disputed. Previous searches for orbiting companions had ruled out the presence of brown dwarfs and supermassive planets.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interstellar dust

Interstellar dust Only about 0.7 percent of the mass of the  interstellar space  is  within the  sort of  solid grains, but these grains have a profound effect on the physical conditions within the gas. Their main effect is  to soak up  stellar radiation; for photons unable to ionize hydrogen and for wavelengths outside absorption lines or bands, the dust grains are  far more  opaque than the gas. The dust absorption increases with photon energy, so long-wavelength radiation (radio and far-infrared) can penetrate dust freely, near-infrared  very well  , and ultraviolet relatively poorly. Dark, cold molecular clouds, within which all star formation takes place, owe their existence to dust. Besides absorbing starlight, the dust acts to heat the gas under some conditions (by ejecting electrons produced by the photoelectric effect, following the absorption of a stellar photon) and  to chill  the gas under other conditions ...
Post a Comment
Read more

How NASA Will Protect Astronauts From Space Radiation at the Moon

How NASA Will Protect Astronauts From Space Radiation at the Moon August 1972, as NASA scientist Ian Richardson remembers it, was hot. In Surrey, England, where he grew up, the fields were brown and dry, and other people tried to remain indoors — out of the Sun, televisions on. except for several days that month, his TV picture kept ending . “Do not adjust your set,” he recalls the BBC announcing. “Heat isn’t causing the interference. It’s sunspots.” The same sunspots that disrupted the tv signals led to enormous solar flares — powerful bursts of energy from the Sun — Aug. 4-7 that year. Between the Apollo 16 and 17 missions, the solar eruptions were a mishap for lunar explorers. Had they been in orbit or on the Moon’s surface, they might have experienced high levels of radiation sparked by the eruptions. Today, the Apollo-era flares function a reminder of the threat of radiation exposure to technology and astronauts in space. Understanding and predicting solar eruptions is cru...
Post a Comment
Read more